Blog

After the Storm

When Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca passed through this part of Florida in late summer 1528, his names and nicknames trailing behind him like soldiers in the van, the haggard band of Spanish soldiers and clerks of which he was a part encountered a country ravaged by storms. He described a “country difficult to traverse and strange to look at,” covered with “great forests” full of “wonderfully tall” trees. So many of these giant trees had fallen, he wrote, “that we had to make long detours and with great trouble” to pass through the country. The trees still standing, he continued in his memoir, were “rent from top to bottom by thunderbolts.” For a man reared on Spain’s rocky, sandstone-colored Mediterranean coast, it must have been strange country, indeed.

Walking in our little corner of the Red Hills in the days since Hurricane Idalia passed by, I’ve been reminded of the old Spanish invader’s experience here. There was a venerable old pine tree that came down up the hill from our place, leaves and sticks and clumps of sodden leaves and moss everywhere, puddles and piles. The most motivated neighbors in our little community set to work right away sawing, raking, grouping, piling, anxious to restore order. Mere hours after the storm, when most of us were only just beginning to open the door and peek outside, these intrepid workers had already mostly finished the cleanup.

People love to set things right like this, but nature prefers chaos. Left to themselves, all these sticks, leaves, and branches will fertilize the earth where they fell, literally becoming soil as the years go by. In the meantime, they swarm with life. Pick up a fallen branch after a few days in the sticky summer heat and you are likely to find a circus of living things—millipedes, roaches, slugs, worms, ants—in the cool, dark depression below. Life thrives in these overturned places.

Over on the other side of the hill, away from the tree felled by Idalia, they cleared a little patch of land earlier this year when a winter storm knocked over a different tree. One day there was a large maple tree standing there, surrounded by shrubs and bushes growing in the shade. A few days after the storm took it down, everything was gone. In its place was simply a patch of bare earth, brown and forlorn, covered with sawdust and drying leaves. Our instinct in a place like this is to stay away. My dog, Penny, snuffled around the patch for a moment and then moved on to the abundantly living places nearby.

Chaos is creative. It gives us new ideas, encourages us to play.

This lonesome state did not last, however. A week after the clearing, there were weeds shooting up all over the bare spot, little clumps of green rapidly colonizing the exposed soil. Vines crept among the clumps of weeds, tentatively, like explorers working across the frontier. A few weeks later, there were little bushes there, a thickening verge of nightshades, kudzu, and wildflowers swarming with bees, wasps, and butterflies. Now, six months later, the little bare spot is wild with greenery, vividly alive with flowers, vines, insects, snakes, mice, birds, lizards, even—oddly enough—a thriving tomato plant.

The formerly bare spot.

There are some, I’m sure, who would like nothing more than to rip that little wild spot out, replace it with St. Augustine grass, and turn the sprinkler on it. I pray to every goddess, god, and lesser celestial entity who comes to mind that these people never get their way. Let them have the rest of the world and leave this two-hundred square feet of jungle to itself.

Chaos is creative. It gives us new ideas, encourages us to play. When I was a child, running around the suburban streets of southern Maryland, there was a nice patch of ignored woodlands next to the house. About five acres, hemmed in by roads, apartments, and fenceless back yards, it was densely treed, networked with narrow paths over dry, deciduous hills and down into boggy depressions. There was even a little pond back there, fifty yards across, murky and filmed with white bubbles in the summer but beautifully iced over for a few blessed days in the winter. I spent hours in that little patch of woods, my magic place, roaming the paths by myself or, more often, trooping down the leafy trails with the peripatetic gaggle of neighborhoods kids.

One day a group of us were ducking and snapping through a trackless portion of the woods about two hundred yards back of a kid named Josh’s house when we made a remarkable discovery. We found a place where some trees had fallen together, interlocked like dominoes that tumbled in different directions. One had fallen over completely, roots and all, a giant clump of red earth at the base looming over a deep hole. One kid, an intrepid girl named Katie, shimmied down in to the hole and found a bunch of tightly packed clods of marbled red and brown dirt. We marveled at these for a moment, these little artifacts of a world long-buried beneath our feet, longer than some clumps of dirt probably deserved. Meanwhile the fallen tree leaned at about a thirty degree angle, many feet up, supported by the strong limbs of a neighboring tree that had managed to survive the storm. A kid named Mark balance-walked right up the leaning trunk of this fallen grandfather. Another tree in the middle of these two had not survived, however. Struck by Mark’s fallen pine, it broke off about ten feet up the trunk and fell into the arms of another tree nearby. Together, along with dangling branches, shrubs, and decaying logs, these fallen trees formed a sort of enclosed clearing, like a cathedral in the dense woods. We saw the potential for this place immediately: this was a fort. We gathered the clods from beneath the tree and piled them at strategic locations along the stockade—dirt bombs. We stationed a sentry at the top of the root-ball tree to keep an eye out for anyone coming.

Sure enough, after a couple days, a group of older kids came by and heard us playing back in the fort. They saw the potential too and undertook a siege on our position. We took up our battle stations and pelted them with dirt bombs until one of them told his little brother (Josh, who had learned of the fort when we came out of the woods into his backyard the day before) that he would tell their mom what we were up to back there. This was a compelling argument to Josh, for some reason, and in his sputtering confusion the older kids broke through our defenses. They chased us for awhile before returning to claim the fort for themselves.

In these days after the storm, I remember the fort vividly. I think about the way this place has always been characterized by fallen trees, draining lakes, flooding rivers, raging forest fires. Living things—plants and millipedes and children, too—thrive in the aftermath of these events. Everything is born of chaos and disorder, and everything will one day return there. We may as well climb the trees and make some dirt bombs in the meantime.

The Future Is Local and Physical

I think there is another post here somewhere (found it -CBC) which makes the same point in greater detail, but I cannot stress enough how strongly I believe this. Two more articles I read today continue to beat the drum punctuating the internet’s rapid fall from the mountaintop of human experience.

The Future is Local. This does not mean that people will turn away from global culture. There will still be K-Pop fans, Russian goths, and other Very Online™ people; but they will use these global identity traits to find meaning among their friends and neighbors in person, rather than an anonymous clique of forum users on the disenchanted, sterilizing network of computers that have dominated our lives since around 2008. Networked computers aren’t going anywhere; they’re just moving to the backseat.

The Future is Physical. Digital artifacts are dismally fucking boring. It’s as simple as that. People aren’t reading magazines on the internet because reading text on the internet is an awful experience. Building a collection of streaming music is about as exciting as sorting paperclips. We do it, but we don’t enjoy it. Watching videos on the internet is what it was like to watch TV in the decades before. You can have a good time, but it doesn’t stick like going to a movie or buying a disc (or a tape, for that matter). Looking at art on Instagram or the web is like watching free porn; do it long enough and you’ll make yourself crazy for the real thing. For all these reasons, the internet cannot take the place of physical things in our lives.

Print, burn, press, paint, draw, record. It’s the way of the future.

“The Climate Is Always Changing”: A Living Document of our Disastrous Times

This is a list of articles documenting the ongoing destruction of the environment. If you believe “it’s just weather,” or “the climate is always changing,” click around below and tie yourself up in a few more knots.

This list will grow over time.

“We see increasing magnitude of certain types of disasters. We see increasing socioeconomic impact from disasters. We’re also seeing disasters in places where we don’t usually see certain types of disasters, and different types of disasters interacting with one another.”

Andrew Kruczkiewicz, senior staff associate at the International Research Institute for Climate and Society at Columbia Climate School, wuoted in Justine Calma, “Climate Change is Redrawing the Disaster Map”

For Digital Immersion

I have just finished Will Blythe’s searching essay on the future (and present) of literary fiction at Esquire. I’ll let Blythe’s argument stand for itself, but to briefly recap: the web, and the devices we use to access it, are radically splintering attention spans. This has already dramatically reduced the viability of literary fiction in traditional venues, he argues, but may spell serious trouble for the future of the literary novel, as well. It’s a powerful, sobering essay. I have thought and written at some length about digital tools, reading, and distraction in these pages, and I largely agree with Blythe on the impossibility of serious, focused thought in our current technological paradigm. I don’t have anything new to say on the subject of distraction, but I did have some thoughts about technology while reading the essay.

When we say “Technology” in 2023, for most people that means smartphones and apps.

This is not just how things worked out. It doesn’t have to be this way. Technology can foster immersive experiences as well as it can splinter attention spans. Technology can contribute to a flowering of literary fiction as readily as it can spell its demise. Technology could give us more literary fiction, more genre fiction, more historiography and literary criticism, more poetry, more everything, as well as extremely powerful tools to annotate, index, summarize, and recall all of these texts.

In fact, technology has given us all of these things. Take a spin around the listings of online literary journals at Duotrope. Look at the insane library of classic literature, periodicals, and texts of all kinds at Project Gutenberg or the Internet Archive. If you are an inveterate notebook-keeper, like me, look at Joplin or OneNote (just not Evernote any more, after recent changes, including a massive price hike). Or just take a look at Notepad and a filesystem. If you take notes specifically around books and articles, and need to build bibliographies, check out Zotero. Need an immersive word processor? Check out FocusWriter. I could keep going, but the point is hopefully clear by now: technology feels hopeless and limiting because our definition of technology is too narrow. One need not look far beyond the confines of iMessage or Twitter X to see that technology has radically exceeded the promise of the “Information Superhighway.”

The smartphone is not the best tool for immersive reading, thinking, and working–but not, necessarily, because of some logic inherent to the form. Smartphones are platforms for apps, and the most popular apps steal their users’ attention because that is what they have been designed to do. Take away the distraction-inducing apps, and you would take away the distraction. But which apps are you willing to delete? The makers of these apps know that attention and relationships are more powerful and pleasurable inducements to action than pretty much anything else in the world–right up there with nicotine, sugar, and opium–and using that fact to drive traffic to their apps is how they make their living. They won’t stop doing it until the demand goes away.

Here are some ways to start reducing that demand.

For Users:

  1. Turn off app notifications on your phone for everything except phone and messaging.
  2. Remove all but the most essential apps from your home screen. If you need to open an app, search for it. Bonus: if you keep notifications enabled, you won’t see badges on the app icons to draw you in.
  3. Instead of replying to messages throughout the day, set aside an hour or so for focused correspondence. You can use this time to write emails, check your DMs, or whatever. Let the messages pile up otherwise. In my experience, people understand after a very short time that you will respond later.

It falls upon those of us who build technology and care deeply about attention and immersion to build experiences that foster attention and thought. For developers, then, two quick thoughts:

  1. Resist user notifications at all costs. If your company uses notifications to drive engagement growth and sales, rather than meet legitimate business needs for the user, you work at the wrong place.
  2. Declutter the interface of dynamic elements, like popup hints and user nudges. Clutter it with tools instead. The interface of LibreOffice Writer affords a great example of this principle. Some would call it ugly, and they would be right. I believe it is ugly in the way that a well-used workbench is ugly, however. This is a happy, focused place for those who thrive among their tools. (You might think this doesn’t work well for smartphone apps, but look at how much dynamic garbage Meta crams onto the Facebook app screen. It works.)

Let’s broaden our definition of “technology” beyond smartphones and apps, and then use what we find in that land beyond to make apps on smartphones better. If we do that, much more than literary fiction is sure to benefit.